|
Directed by: Michael Powell Premise: A disturbed
cinematographer (Carl Boehm), obsessed with capturing fear on film, photographs
himself killing women. What Works: Peeping
Tom is one of those films that is generally appreciated and even adored by
the few people who have seen it but is largely unknown to wider audiences. For
those who have an understanding of cinema, film theory, psychology, or those who
enjoy meta-textual films (movies about movies), Peeping Tom is exemplary. This is a multilayered story about
obsession and the way cinema reflects and embodies our fantasies but also shapes
them. Peeping Tom picks up on the idea
that although films are a way of literalizing our dreams and desires, the
concretizing of our dreams can make film more important to us than the dreams
ever were and film can create a meaning and a reality of its own. This is a
powerful idea, one that has been done since in films such as 8½,
Natural
Born Killers, and Scream.
Peeping Tom is distinct in that it was
one of the first films to do this and it continues to be distinguished in how
well it handles that theme. Aside from the complex thematic material, Peeping
Tom can be appreciated for its wit and intelligence. While not a full blown
satire, Peeping Tom does have satirical elements, especially in the way
it sends up the British film industry. That satire takes a dark turn as the film
contrasts the factory-like production of mainstream film with the seedy but
organic environment of pornography and snuff. And the way Peeping
Tom links those two platforms of cinema together is subtle but skilful and
has serious implications for the way consumers of cinema engage in some degree
of scopophilia. All this is grounded in the frightening and even tragic
portrayal of a man dealing with severe psychological issues. Carl Boehm does a
terrific job as Mark, the cinematographer whose obsessions with capturing women
in fear, lead him to murder. Boehm conveys the desperation of his character’s
desire and makes him very sympathetic but in a responsible way that does not
excuse his crimes but makes them understandable. What Doesn’t: If Peeping
Tom has any flaw it is that the film has not aged very gracefully. Although
the thematic material is still relevant, the look of the film is less timeless
and a lot the characters and settings place the film in a specific era. There is
nothing wrong with that and viewers who are best able to appreciate Peeping
Tom would probably accept or look past those qualities anyway. DVD extras: The Criterion
Collection edition of Peeping Tom
includes a commentary track, a documentary, and a trailer. Bottom Line: Peeping Tom is an important film and one that ought to be more widely seen and appreciated. What the film suggests about cinema, both in its production and in its appeal to viewers, is more than a little subversive and deserves serious consideration. |
|
|