Directed by: Dennis Iliadis
Premise: A remake of Wes
Craven’s 1972 film, which was retelling of Ingmar Bergman’s The
Virgin Spring. A pair of teenage girls are kidnapped, tortured, and
murdered by a gang of sadistic criminals. The gang unknowingly takes shelter at
the home of one of their victims and when her parents discover what has
happened, they take revenge.
What Works: Last House on the Left is yet
another remake of a 1970s horror film but in this case the filmmakers have made
a concerted effort to improve upon the original film and more often than not
they succeed. The original film is remembered more by reputation and for
launching the careers of Wes Craven, Sean Cunningham, and Steve Miner than for
anything to do with the quality of picture, which is quite low. Where the
original was an extremely low budget production with clumsy camera work, amateur
acting, and a plot that relied heavily on coincidence, the remake is slickly
produced, has a more or less logical plotline, and has some very strong
performances. The first two acts of the story are done very well, introducing
the characters and giving them some background. Among the actors, the
interaction between gang leader Krug (Garret Dillahunt) and his son (Spencer
Treat Clark) is really interesting to watch. One interesting decision by the
filmmakers of the remake is how to stage the violence. Where other remakes of
the films of the 1970s, like Marcus
Nispel’s Texas Chainsaw Massacre, have often introduced a lot more
gore into their productions, Last House on the Left actually scales back
the torture and murder of the girls. While it does not have the same excessive
shock of the original, it is a bit more tastefully done and thereby more
accessible for audiences.
What Doesn’t: Last House on the Left goes
awry in the third act of the story in two ways. First, it is not paced very well
and the climax seems to go on forever. Second, the film loses the main thematic
message of the original film, wherein the docile and civilized parents become as
vicious as the gang members. That idea is gone in this version and as a result
the remake loses the subversive quality of the original and ends the picture on
a more optimistic note. It is a trade off that is sure to disappoint purists but
it also robs the story of what made it more than just a revenge flick.
Bottom Line: The remake of Last House on the Left is one of the best, if not the best, in this recent cycle of remakes of 1970s and 80s horror films because it does improve on the original film. What the remake is unable to do, however, is to upset the establishment the way the original film did.