Directed by: Andy Tennant
Premise: A penniless fortune hunter (Matthew
McConaughey) comes across a vital clue to an ancient treasure just as his
estranged wife (Kate Hudson) comes to him seeking a divorce. They rejoin and
team with a vacationing millionaire (Donald Sutherland) to discover the treasure
before a local crime lord finds it.
What Works: The best elements of the film are the
fighting and flirting between Kate Hudson and Matthew McConaughey. These are
possibly to two most underachieving stars in Hollywood; they have talent but
waste more of it before 10 a.m. than most people waste all day. Their scenes
together do have a sense of charisma and comic timing that is amusing to watch.
What Doesn’t: A lot of Fool’s Gold is
just bearable. The story gets bogged down in protracted exposition scenes that
make The Da
Vinci Code and National
Treasure seem straightforward and well researched by comparison. The
characters talk and talk and talk without any visual references and a lot of it
is meaningless chatter that just makes the film longer. A lot of the treasure
hunt is not based on clues or detective work but on luck or coincidence. The
story has a problem with suspense (it does not have any) and as the picture goes
on the tension actually goes down instead of up. This happens mainly because the
story does not put any pressure on the heroes to succeed and clues and
supporting characters randomly pop up in places for no particular reason. The
villains of the film are especially problematic. The crime boss and his goons
are unthreatening racial stereotypes who parade around with guns but are too
clownish to be credible antagonists to the heroes.
Bottom Line: Fool’s Gold is lazy
filmmaking. The film has nothing to offer except for the banter between Hudson
and McConaughey, but they’re less like Humphrey Bogart and Katherine Hepburn
in The African
Queen and more like liposuctioned versions of Al and Peg Bundy from Married
with Children.