Alexander Revisited: The Final Cut
Directed by: Oliver Stone
Premise: The third (and final?) edit of Oliver
Stone’s 2004 film. The picture is a biopic of Alexander the Great (Colin
Farrell) focusing on his relationship with his parents and his political and
military allies.
What Works: This new cut of Alexander is far and away better than the original 2004 film and an
improvement upon the 2005 Director’s Cut, which was also released directly to
DVD. The main problems of the original version were that it was far too talky,
focused too much on Alexander’s romantic relationships but without moving
forward with any one storyline, and got bogged down in a lot of very
melodramatic sequences that made the film come across as a soap opera set in the
ancient world. At 220 minutes, The Final
Cut is the longest version of Alexander but it also makes the most sense of the three. This version appears to have more
focus and Stone has radically changed the structure of the film, opening with
Alexander’s conquest of the Persian Empire, and then cutting back and forth
between his youth, characterizing his relationships with his mother (Angelina
Jolie) and father (Val Kilmer). The new structure allows the viewer to see the
logic in the juxtaposition of sequences and the arrangement of the scenes
reveals much more about Alexander’s psychology and illuminates why he makes
certain decisions in his later life. It is also much more entertaining,
balancing out the action with drama much more effectively. Aside from the
relationship with the parents, The Final
Cut also clarifies Alexander’s relationship to his military staff and his
political maneuvers. Among these, his relationship to Ptolmey, played by Anthony
Hopkins in the outer frame of the narrative and by Elliot Cowan inside the
narrative, is much clearer, and it is much more apparent who Hopkins’
character is and from what point of view he is providing the narration.
Hopkins’ narration has been simplified in this version from the original cut
and the result is much more economical storytelling. The battle sequences in Alexander have also been re-cut and made much more coherent, especially the battle at
Gaugamela, by adding additional footage in the battle itself and including
expanded scenes ahead of the fighting that lay out Alexander’s battle plans.
What Doesn’t: Alexander remains a flawed film, and no amount of recutting can fix some of the
miscasting, namely Angelina Jolie as Olympias. While on her own she is not bad
(her scenes with Connor Paolo as the young Alexander play very well) when paired
with Colin Farrell and trying to play his mother the casting does not work
because she is so obviously the same age. Some of the dialogue remains over the
top and Farrell’s delivery sounds silly and over dramatic at times, especially
when he gets loud. He is far better in the role when he plays it quiet.
DVD Extras: Introduction by Oliver Stone.
Bottom Line: Alexander
Revisited is a bold re-cut that mostly saves a much maligned film. While it
is not Stone’s best work, this is one of his most interesting and The Final
Cut is a vast improvement over the original version. It is a shame that this
version is not the one released theatrically in 2004. As a side note, the three
versions are worth looking at for students of film, particularly those
interested in editing and storytelling in the cinematic form, as the three show
how much a film is made in the editing room.